liberalism

Name:

E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: Liberalism : I realize that the word "liberal" is often booted around in a knee-jerking, reactionary way. When I say "liberal," I’m not using coded speech because I really want to say "gay" or "Jew" or "black" or "female" instead. Your sexual preferences, religion, country of origin, and genitalia bore me to tears. If you thought I was losing sleep over any of these things, I’m sorry to disappoint. The word "liberal" as I’m using it, isn’t meant to imply anything other than someone who identifies himself or herself as a liberal. Since I don’t believe in the tangible existence of "left" or "right," I don’t believe that liberals actually exist. The problem is that liberals believe they exist. : For all their rhetoric sweetness, white liberals are some of the most bitter, judgmental, intolerant people I have ever witnessed. So stuck up it’d take the Jaws of Life to pull them back down. Liberals are one of the whiniest, most protected classes in history. Liberals are simplistically fearful (and naive about) racism, sexism, and homophobia as Christians and conservatives are about Satanism, communism, and pornography. The reason they’re so irritable is because they constantly face a world that does not fit their beliefs. It’s the same way that Christians get all hot and peppery when you start blowing shotgun holes through their arguments. When you begin slicing through a liberal’s flimsy cellophane ideology, his true inner meanness -hardly liberal-is revealed. : It’d help matters if white liberals actually WERE correct. But they blame anger when they should blame frustration. They blame whiteness when they should blame greed. They blame maleness when they should blame power. Instead of dismantling the very architecture of bigotry, they merely slap on a new coat of paint. Their response to a penis-centric culture is Goddess theology and vagina-worship. Their rebuttal to white supremacy is black supremacy. Their rejoinder to gay-bashing is the demonization of hetero "breeders." They say they want to transcend sexism, yet they condemn anything they consider too "male." They want to kill racism, but they shy away from anything too "white." Their response to fascism is their own brand of ideological dictatorship. They only seem to uplift themselves while steeping on others faces. They pin everything on white-male anger, as if there had never been corrupt political regimes in Asia, Africa, or Latin America. As if there had never been anything such as sexism, homophobia, ethnic bigotry, territorial aggression, or police brutality displayed in any of these places. : The most enjoyable thing about analyzing liberalism is watching it run into conflicts of interest - what do they do about black sexism? Latin homophobia? Lesbians who beat their partners? Socialist governments who murder their citizens? Is pedophilia included as a lifestyle choice? Do you ally with the "racism" or the "domestic violence" side of the O.J. Question? : Liberal’s aren’t evil, they’re merely misguided human beings adhering to a code that denies them their humanity. Amid all this stifling equality, the fundamental human need to feel superior was left unsatisfied. For all the tongue-flapping they do about equality, almost all white liberals act as if they feel superior to poor white trash. While they accuse rednecks dehumanizing others, liberals refer to rednecks as "scum," "slime," "vermin," and "subhuman pigs." If whites aren’t even equal among themselves - a premise established by the very IDEA of white trash - how can they be equal with others? If equality doesn’t exist within a race, how can it exist among races?

Optional Link URL:

Link Title:

Optional Image URL: